Indiana

Annabel B. V. Governor Holcomb

Plaintiffs: 10 children in foster care, representing the general class of over 11,000 children in foster care in Indiana. The lawsuit includes a general class and a subclass: the Americans with Disabilities Act subclass, which represents children with emotional, psychological, cognitive, or physical disabilities.

Read the complaint, filed August 16, 2023

Read the press release

Sign up for case updates

about the INdiana foster care system

Indiana is failing to provide children in its care with stable, nurturing, family-like homes. A lack of foster homes mean children’s placements are based on whatever home is available rather than what home is suitable, and children too often wind up in institutions. Other problems include:

  • Frequent moves among homes and institutions increase trauma for children already removed from their family homes and often separated from their siblings, their school, and their community.

  • DCS is unable to meet the needs of the thousands of foster children with disabilities whose involvement in the child welfare system places them at a greater risk of institutionalization.

  • The child welfare system relies too heavily on institutionalization, particularly for children with even minor behavioral problems, with many children often placed in locked, restrictive, poor quality and jail-like facilities.

  • The system is not set up to provide children the necessary services and treatment they need—foster children’s medical, mental health, and physical needs remain unmet due to irregular, infrequent assessments and the lack of sufficient and available resources.

  • DCS fails to recruit and retain an adequate number of caseworkers. Overworked caseworkers struggle to make important but difficult decisions about the right services to provide—they face having too many children to serve, too few resources, and too little training.

  • DCS’s termination of parental rights practices cause children to remain in foster care for years, caught in limbo between reunification and adoption.

  • DCS’s treatment of foster parents causes foster parents to stop accepting placements, discourages foster parents from renewing their licenses, and deters prospective foster parents from seeking a license.

ADVOCACY GOALs

Annabel B. v. Holcomb requests that the court permanently prohibit DCS from subjecting the children in the general class and the ADA subclass to further harm and from threatening their safety and well-being through practices that violate their rights. The case seeks an order directing DCS to, among other things:

  • Establish processes to ensure that children receive timely and appropriate mental and medical treatment;

  • Lower caseloads of individual workers to professional standards and adopt a caseload counting methodology that accurately reflects workload;

  • Maintain accurate medical records for all foster children;

  • Conduct face-to-face visits with all foster children at least once per month, and at least twice per month for children on trial home visits;

  • Inform foster parents of the foster child’s medical needs prior to placement;

  • Establish a policy that prohibits retaliation against foster parents;

  • Ensure that children with disabilities have an opportunity to receive services in their home communities;

  • Develop a process to properly match children with safe and appropriate foster home placements; and

  • Contract with an outside entity to conduct a needs assessment that includes a plan with mandatory benchmarks.

Progress

The Seventh Circuit has a narrower version of the abstention doctrine than one espoused by the United States Supreme Court.  We have been successful in other jurisdictions where the issue has been raised as a bar to challenging the foster care conditions in that state’s foster care system in federal court.  In Indiana we lost the first case on the issues based on the Circuit’s view and it looks like our case may also face the same challenges.  But we won’t give up. We will petition for rehearing en banc and will probably try to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Meet OUR PLANTIFFS

(All names below are pseudonyms)

Help us fix INDiana’s Foster care system.

DONATE TODAY.